why does R. Gaspari lump all feminists together?
Not every single feminist alive today hates men. There are many feminists who still simply believe in equality of the sexes and believe in fighting for that (such as equal pay for equal work). I don’t understand Gaspari’s hatred for those who don’t hate men. Somebody help?
Elvis, are you saying that you would not give a female a hero’s welcome?
Gaspari, how about you explain in your own words instead of being a chickenshit and making a video explain for you.
Best answer:
Answer by Magnificent Bastard
I think it’s satire.
Add your own answer in the comments!
No not all but 90% do an the results are the answers on here. I think the hate is from the fems on here cause he speaks his mind. Now I never see all the awful things some of your top contributors on this section come into question by fems. Its a hypocrisy an every time I see a question directed at R Gaspari I just want to commend him. He may be thumbed down but here he will receive a hero’s welcome. That’s if he is a he an not a she I don’t know.
edit – No if R Gaspari is a women awsome there is ticker tape an a parade for them here.
11.23.11 at 10:47 am
I don’t know the answer to this. I wish I did…I wish he would explain it also.
11.23.11 at 11:44 am
Mainstream feminism is enough to give anyone reason to despise modern feminism. Gasparis smarter than just simply making generalizations, he’s highlighting the ugly side of feminism for all to see.
11.23.11 at 12:12 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbXq_Z2K39U
11.23.11 at 12:55 pm
I think you have an obsession with Gaspari to give him this much attention.
11.23.11 at 1:37 pm
Because the casual feminist’s act as human shield’s.
And international law’s and human rights tribunes have clearly stated silence and cowardice(it was the leader who did it) is not a valid excuse when it comes to crimes against humanity.
Casual feminist’s have allowed radical feminist’s to speak for them and women’s rights issue’s since the 70′s.
Feminist’s decided to allow radicals to have free reign now they try to avoid the blow back of a decade of hateful sexist policies.
I am sorry but you can’t have your cake and eat it to.
When everything is said and done we can and will be held accountable for our actions and inaction’s.
11.23.11 at 1:41 pm
Who cares, consider the source. He is obsessively consumed and infatuated with “modern feminism” and has an apparent daily quota of noting it; his posts could cure insomnia.
11.23.11 at 1:52 pm
Obsessive, much?
11.23.11 at 2:25 pm
He’s really not worth this much fretting.
Sometimes he gives very intelligent and insightful answers when it comes to feminism and other subjects. Other times he posts pointless rants. It’s not any different than what any other person on this board does.
There are other positive things in your life you could be focusing on. Right now you are focusing on something negative. If he causes you so much grief then take that negativity and anger and channel it into something positive for yourself.
Otherwise, just don’t read his posts. <—–That’s the simplest solution.
11.23.11 at 2:42 pm
I find it odd that his account just go deleted….
11.23.11 at 3:21 pm
If I can lump all Nazis together just by judging Hitler, why not do the same with feminists?
Radical misandrists like Dworkin, Greer and McKinnon are the poster-girls of feminism. If it is fair to think there were no naive and innocent Nazis because Hitler’s evil had that much influence, it is damn fair to say that there are no naive and innocent feminists because Dworkin et al’s misandry has had just as much influence.
NOW actually celebrates Dworkin and her influence on the movement. And NOW is representative of all feminists. What does that tell you about the movement?
These ‘innocent’ feminists can’t claim to be ‘innocent people wanting equality’ if they keep letting radicals be their voice. For people who want true equality, these ‘good’ feminists aren’t doing much about these radicals and their influence are they?
Looks to me like they want the benefits of the misandry and the anti-male laws, as well as to be considered innocent women.
Feminism today is misandry, nothing else. People who want feminism don’t want equality, and those who don’t want equality don’t want feminism.
http://www.fatherland.info/docs/if-men-have-all-the-power.pdf
http://www.rulymob.com/
http://www.freewebs.com/feminism-evaluated/
http://www.ukmm.org.uk/issues/suppression/nl.htm
What can you say about a movement that uses insults, blame and shame instead of rational argument?
11.23.11 at 3:39 pm
So he doesn’t have to think as much. It’s easier to complain if you make things up about a group of people, and assume it applies to ALL people in that group. The poor thing! Thinking r hard :’(
11.23.11 at 3:47 pm
Maybe for the same reason you tend to lump all men together as evil, perhaps?
11.23.11 at 4:23 pm
If he doesn’t want all men to be lumped into the same category then he shouldn’t be a hypocrite and lump all feminists into the same category. Would he call Zack De La Rocha from Rage against the machine a be considered radical feminist? Because Zack is a feminist, he is not a radical. Would he call Ian McKay from fugazi a radical feminist? Because he is a feminist too. I know heaps of male and female feminists (myself included) who practise humanism and just want ethical/equal treatment for women. I think he just looks at all the bad ones thrown into the media and spins it into reality.
11.23.11 at 4:37 pm
pea-brain-itis combined with a severe lack of success with females over the lifespan.
Seriously – the guy sits at the computer 24/7 posting on YA! Clearly he has no life and exists to bash ‘modern feminists’. It’s hilarious and sad at the same time.
11.23.11 at 5:26 pm
Becua sehe’s a male misogynists that hates women and feminists, and pretends to be a woman to give them a bad name
11.23.11 at 5:46 pm
I have to disagree with you,all feminists hate men despite of them saying otherwise. If feminists were all about equality,they would call themselves genderists instead of feminists.
R Gaspari is just telling the truth.
11.23.11 at 5:57 pm